After weeks and weeks of hard work… and many trips to Lowes, Laura has just about finished the upgrade to our office. She stripped all the old molding off from around the baseboard and in the closet. Pulled out all the panels in the closet and put beadboard up. It looks beautiful! On to the the kitchen.
Whew. So for Memorial Day this year, I decided to bike from Redondo Beach and meet Laura who was staying with Angie in Santa Monica. Sounds like fun, right? It was a goregeous day and it was great! The boardwalk by the beach is mostly flat so it was an easy ride. Mapmyrun.com said it was about 18 miles but there were so many twists and turns… it felt a bit longer. I am sure me being totally out of shape didn’t help. With frequent stops to take pictures, it took me 2.5 hrs. All capped by a great breakfast at Jack and Jills.
Jack and Jills
510 Santa Monica Blvd
Santa Monica, CA 90401
(310) 656-1501
see the rest of the pictures here.
The 70-200mm lenses are probably the most versatile. They are a great travel lens… able to do portraits, compress landscapes and capture images you can’t get closed to. The 2.8′s are a bit of monsters… over 3 lbs. But if you can carry it, it is certainly worth it… as is the IS if you can afford it.
I have a love-hate relationship with this lens. I love the images it produces but hate how damn heavy it is. I also hate that it is white. I wish there was a black option like Nikon. It is purely cosmetic but I feel it is so conspicous when you whip out this enormous white lens. I know the 1D is already inconspicous itself… but the bazoka being white does not help. The lens is super solid, weather-sealed and did I say it produced amazing images!
This is my second most used lens. Mainly because it is the small, light and convenient to take around. It also produces beautiful images. I had the 50mm f/1.2 L for a while and although I loved the build quality, the bokeh, and the colors… it certainly wasn’t worth $1000 more than this lens. Plus, I did experience its weird focus issues at close distances between f/2.0 and f/2.8.
The 50mm works well on a 1.3 crop for everyday shooting and can also serve as a portrait lens. With the 24L, it makes a great everyday combo. Throw in a 70-200L, and I have a travel kit.

I was a die hard PC user all my life. Until last year. I don’t know if it was because I moved to L.A. and became a shallow human being and just wanted a “pretty” computer or if I really did see an advantage. I had vocally swore off Mac’s claiming they were proprietary, over-priced and simply because I thought the Mac-cult users were idots.
But now I am part of that cult… and I can’t explain why. I have an iPhone. I have a MacBook. I love it. I am pathetic.
Although the stats overall say that Apple still only commands an 8% marketshare of the entire computer market, a recent number published on MacWorld (any bias here?) says they have 66% of the $1000 plus marketshare.
Macs: the latest status symbol.
The 24L is probably my favorite lens in my lineup. It was a lens I wanted for a long time. I had actually originally gotten the 35L (which is another FANTASTIC lens) and 24L to test against each other. I kept the 35L which was nice on my 1D Mark II and the PERFECT focal length on my 5D. When the 5D went, I wanted that focal length back and, based on ONE website, bought another 24L. On my 1D Mark III, it has quickly become my favorite.
It is the perfect wide-angle (good for full body shots and close ups of dogs) and super fast. It is a good size and very solid. The lens hood can be shared with my 16-35L. Since the Nikon D3 was released, I have thought about “going to the dark-side” but the inhibitive price to replace this lens with the Nikon 28mm f/1.4 has kept me from experimenting with the “other” brand.
To ease into the writing part of the blog, I’ll start on a subject I can talk endlessly about… photo gear. First up, the hub of a camera system: the body.
I picked up a Canon 1D Mark III a few months ago. For the most part it is a great camera. But what a rap it has taken for its focus problems. I can’t decide if it is this negative reputation that has affected the way I see my pictures or if there really were more soft images. But it did seem that I was getting more soft images than with my 1D Mark II. After Richard and Regina’s wedding, I sent the camera back for the “fix” and it seems to be better… but it is probably all in my head.
The camera otherwise is more than I could have asked for. It is responds faster, colors/WB are more accurate out of camera and can shoot over 1000 frames between charges. The live view function is actually helpful believe it or not… great for tripod and product shots (for eBay of course). I do have to say… my favorite feature over the 1D Mark II is that it is much LIGHTER! I am getting old. As I get over the stigma, I think I will grow to love this body more and more.
Well… is it sharp?
So after much debate, I decided to move my old photoblog to a more up-to-date blog. This will let me categorize and share some more than just pictures. I know what you are all thinking… yippee. Hope everyone enjoys.