<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>aaron lam • life through the lens &#187; large</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aaronlam.com/blog/tag/large/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aaronlam.com/blog</link>
	<description>aaron lam photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:17:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>belstaff 556 colonial shoulder bag.</title>
		<link>http://www.aaronlam.com/blog/2009/07/18/belstaff-556-colonial-shoulder-bag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aaronlam.com/blog/2009/07/18/belstaff-556-colonial-shoulder-bag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 03:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronlam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gearhead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1DmkIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[554]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[556]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belstaff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colonial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kinesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mountain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoulder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v090]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronlam.wordpress.com/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know when I posted the Belstaff 554 Large Colonial Shoulder Bag I said that was the last bag I would ever buy. Well, I lied. The Belstaff 554 is a fantastic bag and I have no regrets. But I found myself often faced with the comment, &#8220;Wow. Nice bag&#8230; it&#8217;s big.&#8221; And people were ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/misc/belstaff/index.html" target="_blank"><img src="/misc/belstaff/belstaff556/belstaff556_01.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="700"/></a></p>
<p>I know when I posted the <a href="/blog/2008/08/14/belstaff-554-large-colonial-shoulder-bag/">Belstaff 554 Large Colonial Shoulder Bag</a> I said that was the last bag I would ever buy. Well, I lied.</p>
<p>The Belstaff 554 is a fantastic bag and I have no regrets. But I found myself often faced with the comment, &#8220;Wow. Nice bag&#8230; it&#8217;s big.&#8221; And people were right. It IS big. Big enough to carry my 15&#8243; Macbook Pro. I was hoping the bag would be able to be an everyday carry as well as my work bag. But using it as an everyday carry was just a bit bigger than I&#8217;d like. Put it this way, fully loaded, it wouldn&#8217;t fit under some of the smaller seats on a plane. And fully loaded&#8230; it was HEAVY.</p>
<p>So I started looking and thinking about another bag. It was hard. I had been spoiled by the Belstaff bag. So when I came upon an ad for a Belstaff 556 Colonial Shoulder Bag (regular size)&#8230; I jumped on it. Mountain brown just like my larger bag.</p>
<p>I have had it for about a month now and through a trip to Orlando and a trip to New Zealand. It is GREAT! This is the perfect size for everyday carry and travel. Big enough to throw a good amount of stuff in, books magazines, a netbook etc. Not too heavy to carry around all day. Same great construction as the 554.</p>
<p>It also has one really nice feature. It fits a Tenba Messenger Photo Insert perfectly. I saw this insert on Flickr and it is actually better than all the Domke ones that I swore buy. It is PERFECT for a messenger shaped bag&#8230; none of the Domke&#8217;s really are. With it, I can actually fit a Canon 1DmkIII and 3 lenses. Or even the 70-200L f/2.8 IS and another lens mounted. In a bind, I can load the 1DmkIII holster style (lens pointed down). The top closes&#8230; barely and is not that comfortable to carry but it fits&#8230; in a bind.</p>
<p>So if I had a choice, I&#8217;d go with the 556 over the 554. It&#8217;s just more universally usable. But I like having two and don&#8217;t feel it is duplicating. In a time where Belstaff seems to be stopping the manufacturing of these bags (STUPID STUPID STUPID)&#8230; I am glad I have another in case something were to happen to the other. Both mine also don&#8217;t have the magnets and the seams match the color of the bag. The newer ones have magnets under the latches and a different color seam. Now why would they do that!</p>
<p>The dimensions measured at the seams* are: 10.25 in tall x 12 in wide x 3 in deep at the top and 4 in deep at the bottom.</p>
<p>Front pockets are 6.5 in tall x 4.5 in wide x 1 in deep.<br />
Side pockets are 5 in tall by 4 in wide&#8230; tight rounded depth.<br />
Inside zippered pocket is 7 in long.<br />
* inside might be a bit smaller.</p>
<p><a href="/misc/belstaff/index.html" target="_blank">Pictures of Belstaff Colonial 556</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aaronlam.com/blog/2009/07/18/belstaff-556-colonial-shoulder-bag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

