<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>aaron lam • life through the lens &#187; prime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aaronlam.com/blog/tag/prime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aaronlam.com/blog</link>
	<description>aaron lam photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:17:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>canon 24mm f/1.4 L II.</title>
		<link>http://www.aaronlam.com/blog/2009/07/01/canon-24mm-f1-4-l-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aaronlam.com/blog/2009/07/01/canon-24mm-f1-4-l-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronlam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gearhead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1.4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1d mark III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1dIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24LII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24mm f/1.4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaronlam.wordpress.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay. Why would you plunk down over $1500 for a prime, wide angle? There is just something magic about this lens to me. The Mark I version was a favorite lens of mine to shoot dogs with. You couldn&#8217;t match the background blur, color and build quality of that lens. I was always very happy ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><a href="http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/camera/lens/ef/data/wide/ef_24_14lii_usm.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/camera/lens/ef/data/wide/spec/ef24_14lii_usm.jpg" border="0" alt="" height="165" /></a></center></p>
<p>Okay. Why would you plunk down over $1500 for a prime, wide angle? There is just something magic about this lens to me. The Mark I version was a favorite lens of mine to shoot dogs with. You couldn&#8217;t match the background blur, color and build quality of that lens. I was always very happy with it but when Canon announced a Mark II version&#8230; I was intrigued. But I did hold off for some reviews&#8230; plus they weren&#8217;t in stock ANYWHERE. (I actually got a decent deal on eBay and used www.live.com 8% cashback program).</p>
<p>Well, the reviews all indicated marginally better sharpness and much better build quality. That&#8217;s exactly what I found too. It does focus a little faster and more reliably than the Mark I version. It&#8217;s truly a beautiful lens and take AMAZING photos. If you are looking for a fast wide angle&#8230; this baby is it!</p>
<p class=imageP><a href="/galleries/dogs/joey2/joey211.jpg" class="highslide" onclick="return hs.expand(this)" target="_blank"><img src="/galleries/dogs/joey2/joey211.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><a href="/galleries/dogs/boomer/boomer7.jpg" class="highslide" onclick="return hs.expand(this)" target="_blank"><img src="/galleries/dogs/boomer/boomer7.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="700" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aaronlam.com/blog/2009/07/01/canon-24mm-f1-4-l-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

